YNVISIBLE INTERACTIVE WKN: A2JBST ISIN: CA9858441095 Kürzel: 1XNA Forum: Aktien Thema: Hauptdiskussion

Lache mich schlapp, war das nicht das Hauptgeschäft, dass seit Jahren verkauft wird? Labels?? Und bisher gab es keine Möglichkeit das zu integrieren wegen den Anschlüssen? Also gibt es kein Produkt bisher in diese Richtung…

Ynvisible’s printed e-paper displays need to be connected to other electronic components and systems to create new products. Traditional component connectors are bulky and rigid, therefore not allowing Ynvisible’s thin and flexible displays to be integrated into products such as smart cards or labels. To solve this challenge, Ynvisible was on the lookout for an alternative.

https://www.ynvisible.com/news-inspiration/ynvisible-and-condalign-partner-to-enhance-e-paper-integration-into-smart-applications

Läuft ja brutal eure Perle :D

Wieso gab es etwas interessantes?

Zudem sehr ruhig hier trotz, der Q1 Zahlen? Hat darin keiner was positives gefunden? Schade…

Es zeigt einfach dass ich euch schon immer sage… das Produkt ist viel zu teuer für Lebensmittel und daher bei Lebensmittel sinnlos… zu teuer für den Nutzen.. wieso sollte jemand 50ct oder mehr für das Label zahlen wenn das Produkt nur 1-2€ kostet? Zudem wenn hintendran ein Produkt steht das ne Woche zwei länger haltbar ist greift jeder nach dem hinteren, wieso auch nicht…

..But, as always, it comes down to the bottom line. “Producers don’t even want a penny added to the cost of packaging,” laments Professor Didar. The chemicals he and his team are using are inexpensive; they’ve optimised their packaging so that it wouldn’t add more than 10 to 20 cents per product. But even that is currently deemed too high in the current market, where food-flation has hit consumers hard the world over. “To me it doesn’t seem like a significant amount, but producers don’t want to add anything to the price,” he adds. Ynvisible’s system is pricier per unit due to the use of electronics – in the region of 50 cents to $3-5 per label at present (though this would be hugely reduced if the process was scaled up, the company says). “This is the main barrier to entry for smart labels in this space,” says Heydarpour. “The cost of smart labels is considerably higher than analogue labels. In the long run, they are, however, a much more sustainable approach and can significantly contribute to minimising the impact of a serious environmental problem...”

...And they aren’t the only ones working on smart technology in the food industry. Ynvisible, also based in Canada, has developed smart labels to give accurate real-time information on food’s freshness and safety that knock “analogue” labels into a cocked hat. Combining thin and flexible e-paper displays with various sensors, the smart labels offer “a highly effective way to ensure product quality and safety of perishable food and pharmaceuticals”, says the company’s CEO, Ramin Heydarpour. Where McMaster’s scientists have used chemicals, Ynvisible mainly uses microelectronics to monitor indicators like temperature and humidity, and gas sensors to detect food spoilage. “The traditional ‘expiry date’ system has tremendous inefficiencies and continuing to use this system has negative impacts at many levels: environmentally, economically and health-related,” argues Heydarpour. “Developing technology for a more accurate shelf-life determination can in fact help all actors in the food value chain reduce their influence on one of the most pressing current climate issues – food waste.” Here in the UK, there’s Oli Tec, which has developed an intelligent time and temperature label. Using a scale of amber to red, the label gradually transitions between colours to clearly indicate an item’s freshness. The process slows down in cool temperatures and speeds up in warmer ones; according to the company, this “simple colour-changing indicator provides a clear, highly visible call to action that both retailers and consumers can understand at a glance”. Nik Richardson, chief executive of Oli Tec, said they’d developed the labels to reduce waste. From a layman’s perspective, it seems a no-brainer for food producers to sign up to this revolutionary tech. From avoiding the reputational and practical costs associated with food poisoning epidemics to the dramatic potential reduction in food waste, the benefits are huge. In a paper published by the Nature Reviews Bioengineering journal last month, Professor Didar’s team explained how utilising the products they’ve developed would literally save tens of billions of dollars a year, especially when factoring in the healthcare and lost-time costs associated with E coli and salmonella outbreaks...

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/smart-packaging-food-waste-expiry-dates-best-before-b2554649.html?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR2WQzaKKl8tgvHj3lrfEXtVsCDhTNDHV273axiSzwa72cxbXVbWFHJqzyk_aem_ATqLFdfy57MfCDtsWWQQwqKgRoE_KAlU_qkSmlrLlgloWrCKbFMFYO86E3tud04moej_b5NxElZbx31CjAmFbu3b#lwyunfz61medb1tmmr1

Klar ganz bestimmt

Vielleicht im nächsten Quartal… oder schon drin 😉

Morgen ist ja auch noch ein Tag..

LOL krasse Bewegungen

Heute ist ja auch noch ein Tag… haben es bestimmt vergessen.. am Strand vergesst man einfach die Zeit…